October 2018 Newsletter

Recent News and Announcements

 

New publication! Nursing Guide for Managing Side Effects to Drug-resistant TB Treatment is a collaborative project between CITC and the International Council of Nurses (ICN). This guide was developed by nurses with experience in the clinical care and programmatic management of TB and DR-TB in both high- and low-resource settings.

The guide is designed as a reference and job aid so nurses can quickly:

  1. Identify symptoms that may indicate a side effect related to DR-TB treatment or antiretroviral medication;
  2. Assess for severity as well as other potential contributors; and
  3. Intervene appropriately in order to minimize patient discomfort, reduce side effect progression, and ultimately support successful treatment completion.

Access the full guide here.

PUBLICATIONS

 

1. Clinical trial research in focus: overcoming barriers in MDR-TB clinical trials.
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Apr;5(4):247-248. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30091-7.
Zumla A, Abubakar I.

ABSTRACT: The WHO 2016 annual report states “The TB epidemic is larger than previously estimated”. There were an estimated 480 000 new cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and a substantial proportion of them remain undiagnosed and untreated. The current WHO-recommended MDR-TB treatment regimen is associated with poor treatment outcomes. The regimen is based on no trial evidence of efficacy and might not cover local, evolving tuberculosis drug resistance patterns. Many patients with MDR-TB who survive, suffer long-term lung damage and functional disability, and are unable to return to gainful employment.

Read free abstract here. Not open access.

2. Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):265-275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30078-X.
Fregonese F1, Ahuja SD2, Akkerman OW3, Arakaki-Sanchez D 4, Ayakaka I5, Baghaei P6, Bang D7, Bastos M8, Benedetti A9, Bonnet M10, Cattamanchi A11, Cegielski P12, Chien JY13, Cox H14, Dedicoat M15, Erkens C16, Escalante P17, Falzon D18, Garcia-Prats AJ19, Gegia M18, Gillespie SH20, Glynn JR21, Goldberg S22, Griffith D23, Jacobson KR24, Johnston JC25, Jones-López EC24, Khan A22, Koh WJ26, Kritski A27, Lan ZY9, Lee JH28, Li PZ1, Maciel EL29, Galliez RM30, Merle CSC31, Munang M15, Narendran G32, Nguyen VN33, Nunn A34, Ohkado A35, Park JS28, Phillips PPJ36, Ponnuraja C37, Reves R38, Romanowski K39, Seung K40, Schaaf HS19, Skrahina A41, Soolingen DV42, Tabarsi P6, Trajman A43, Trieu L2, Banurekha VV32, Viiklepp P44, Wang JY13, Yoshiyama T45, Menzies D46.

BACKGROUND: Isoniazid-resistant, rifampicin-susceptible (INH-R) tuberculosis is the most common form of drug resistance, and is associated with failure, relapse, and acquired rifampicin resistance if treated with first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. The aim of the study was to compare success, mortality, and acquired rifampicin resistance in patients with INH-R pulmonary tuberculosis given different durations of rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (REZ); a fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ; and streptomycin plus a core regimen of REZ.

METHODS: Studies with regimens and outcomes known for individual patients with INH-R tuberculosis were eligible, irrespective of the number of patients if randomised trials, or with at least 20 participants if a cohort study. Studies were identified from two relevant systematic reviews, an updated search of one of the systematic reviews (for papers published between April 1, 2015, and Feb 10, 2016), and personal communications. Individual patient data were obtained from authors of eligible studies. The individual patient data meta-analysis was performed with propensity score matched logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and risk differences of treatment success (cure or treatment completion), death during treatment, and acquired rifampicin resistance. Outcomes were measured across different treatment regimens to assess the effects of: different durations of REZ (≤6 months vs >6 months); addition of a fluoroquinolone to REZ (fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ vs 6 months or more of REZ); and addition of streptomycin to REZ (streptomycin plus 6 months of rifampicin and ethambutol and 1–3 months of pyrazinamide vs 6 months or more of REZ). The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

FINDINGS: Individual patient data were requested for 57 cohort studies and 17 randomised trials including 8089 patients with INH-R tuberculosis. We received 33 datasets with 6424 patients, of which 3923 patients in 23 studies received regimens related to the study objectives. Compared with a daily regimen of 6 months of (H)REZ (REZ with or without isoniazid), extending the duration to 8–9 months had similar outcomes; as such, 6 months or more of (H)REZ was used for subsequent comparisons. Addition of a fluoroquinolone to 6 months or more of (H)REZ was associated with significantly greater treatment success (aOR 2·8, 95% CI 1·1–7·3), but no significant effect on mortality (aOR 0·7, 0·4–1·1) or acquired rifampicin resistance (aOR 0·1, 0·0–1·2). Compared with 6 months or more of (H)REZ, the standardised retreatment regimen (2 months of streptomycin, 3 months of pyrazinamide, and 8 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol) was associated with significantly worse treatment success (aOR 0·4, 0·2–0·7). The quality of the evidence was very low for all outcomes and treatment regimens assessed, owing to the observational nature of most of the data, the diverse settings, and the imprecision of estimates.

INTERPRETATION: In patients with INH-R tuberculosis, compared with treatment with at least 6 months of daily REZ, addition of a fluoroquinolone was associated with better treatment success, whereas addition of streptomycin was associated with less treatment success; however, the quality of the evidence was very low. These results support the conduct of randomised trials to identify the optimum regimen for this important and common form of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Read abstract here. Not open access.

3. Time to revise WHO-recommended definitions of MDR-TB treatment outcomes.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):246-248. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30104-8.
Lange C, van Leth F, Mitnick CD, Dheda K, Günther G.

ABSTRACT: According to the latest WHO global tuberculosis report, 10.4 million people worldwide developed tuberculosis in 2016. The number of people developing newly acquired tuberculosis has increased by 1.8 million (or 17%) during the past 5 years. Additionally, the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), defined as tuberculosis caused by bacteria resistant to the two first-line antituberculosis drugs rifampicin and isoniazid, is especially alarming. For the first time, in 2017, the leaders of the G20 nations recognised antimicrobial-resistant tuberculosis as a growing threat to public health and economic growth.

Read abstract here. Not open access.

4. Time to act on injectable-free regimens for children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):662-664. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30329-1.
Seddon JA, Schaaf HS, Marais BJ, McKenna L, Garcia-Prats AJ, Hesseling AC, Hughes J, Howell P, Detjen A, Amanullah F, Singh U, Master I, Perez-Velez CM, Misra N, Becerra MC, Furin JJ.

ABSTRACT: We read with interest the study by Kathryn Schnippel and colleagues, showing good efficacy and low toxicity associated with bedaquiline use in adults with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. An interim analysis from endTB, released on July 13, 2018, evaluating the use of bedaquiline and delamanid in more than 1000 patients, has also demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these new drugs. The tide appears to be turning, and in June, 2018, the South African Department of Health announced that bedaquiline will now replace second-line injectable agents in the routine treatment of all patients with rifampicin-resistant or multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis aged 12 years and older.

Read abstract here.  Not open access.

September 2018 Newsletter

1. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):821-834. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31644-1.
Collaborative Group for the Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data in MDR-TB treatment–2017, Ahmad N(1), Ahuja SD(2), Akkerman OW(3), Alffenaar JC(4), Anderson LF(5), Baghaei P(6), Bang D(7), Barry PM(8), Bastos ML(9), Behera D(10), Benedetti A(11), Bisson GP(12), Boeree MJ(13), Bonnet M(14), Brode SK(15), Brust  JCM(16), Cai Y(17), Caumes E(18), Cegielski JP(19), Centis R(20), Chan PC(21), Chan ED(22), Chang KC(23), Charles M(24), Cirule A(25), Dalcolmo MP(26), D’Ambrosio L(27), de Vries G(28), Dheda K(29), Esmail A(29), Flood J(8), Fox GJ(30), Fréchet-Jachym M(31), Fregona G(32), Gayoso R(26), Gegia M(5), Gler MT(33), Gu S(34), Guglielmetti L(35), Holtz TH(19), Hughes J(36), Isaakidis P(37), Jarlsberg L(38), Kempker RR(39), Keshavjee S(40), Khan FA(11), Kipiani M(41), Koenig SP(42), Koh WJ(43), Kritski A(44), Kuksa L(45), Kvasnovsky CL(46),  Kwak N(47), Lan Z(11), Lange C(48), Laniado-Laborín R(49), Lee M(50), Leimane V(25), Leung CC(23), Leung EC(23), Li PZ(11), Lowenthal P(8), Maciel EL(32), Marks SM(51), Mase S(52), Mbuagbaw L(53), Migliori GB(20), Milanov V(54), Miller AC(55), Mitnick CD(55), Modongo C(56), Mohr E(36), Monedero I(57), Nahid P(38), Ndjeka N(58), O’Donnell MR(59), Padayatchi N(60), Palmero D(61), Pape JW(62), Podewils LJ(19), Reynolds I(34), Riekstina V(25), Robert J(63), Rodriguez M(64),  Seaworth B(65), Seung KJ(66), Schnippel K(67), Shim TS(68), Singla R(69), Smith SE(19), Sotgiu G(70), Sukhbaatar G(71), Tabarsi P(6), Tiberi S(72), Trajman A(73), Trieu L(2), Udwadia ZF(74), van der Werf TS(75), Veziris N(63), Viiklepp P(76), Vilbrun SC(77), Walsh K(77), Westenhouse J(8), Yew WW(78), Yim JJ(47), Zetola NM(56), Zignol M(5), Menzies D(79).

BACKGROUND:Treatment outcomes for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis remain poor.
We aimed to estimate the association of treatment success and death with the use
of individual drugs, and the optimal number and duration of treatment with those
drugs in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
METHODS: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify potentially eligible observational and experimental studies published between Jan 1, 2009, and April 30, 2016. We also searched reference lists from all systematic reviews of treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis published since 2009. To be eligible, studies had to report original results, with end of treatment outcomes (treatment
completion [success], failure, or relapse) in cohorts of at least 25 adults (aged >18 years). We used anonymised individual patient data from eligible studies, provided by study investigators, regarding clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Using propensity score-matched generalised mixed effects logistic,  or linear regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences for success or death during treatment, for specific drugs currently used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, as well as the number of drugs used and treatment duration.
FINDINGS: Of 12 030 patients from 25 countries in 50 studies, 7346 (61%) had treatment success, 1017 (8%) had failure or relapse, and 1729 (14%) died. Compared with failure or relapse, treatment success was positively associated with the use of linezolid (adjusted risk difference 0·15, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·18), levofloxacin (0·15, 0·13 to 0·18), carbapenems (0·14, 0·06 to 0·21), moxifloxacin (0·11, 0·08 to 0·14), bedaquiline (0·10, 0·05 to 0·14), and clofazimine (0·06, 0·01 to 0·10). There was a significant association between reduced mortality and use of linezolid (-0·20, -0·23 to -0·16), levofloxacin (-0·06, -0·09 to -0·04), moxifloxacin (-0·07, -0·10 to -0·04), or bedaquiline (-0·14, -0·19 to -0·10). Compared with regimens without any injectable drug, amikacin provided modest benefits, but kanamycin and capreomycin were associated with worse outcomes. The remaining drugs were associated with slight or no improvements in outcomes. Treatment outcomes were significantly worse for most drugs if they were used despite in-vitro resistance. The optimal number of effective drugs seemed to be five in the initial phase, and four in the continuation phase. In these adjusted analyses, heterogeneity, based on a simulated I2 method, was high for approximately half the estimates for specific drugs, although relatively low for  number of drugs and durations analyses.
INTERPRETATION: Although inferences are limited by the observational nature of these data, treatment outcomes were significantly better with use of linezolid, later generation fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, clofazimine, and carbapenems for  treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis. These findings emphasise the need  for trials to ascertain the optimal combination and duration of these drugs for treatment of this condition.
FUNDING:American Thoracic Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Respiratory Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Read full article here.

2. Time to act on injectable-free regimens for children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):662-664. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30329-1.
Seddon JA(1), Schaaf HS(2), Marais BJ(3), McKenna L(4), Garcia-Prats AJ(2), Hesseling AC(2), Hughes J(2), Howell P(5), Detjen A(6), Amanullah F(7), Singh U(8), Master I(9), Perez-Velez CM(10), Misra N(9), Becerra MC(11), Furin JJ(11).

Read full article here.

3. Improved treatment outcomes with bedaquiline when substituted for second-line injectable agents in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 24. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy727. [Epub ahead of print]
Zhao Y(1), Fox T(1), Manning K(1), Stewart A(2), Tiffin N(3)(4)(5), Khomo N(1), Leslie J(1), Boulle A(3), Mudaly V(6), Kock Y(6), Meintjes G(1)(5), Wasserman S(1)(5).

BACKGROUND:Bedaquiline is used as a substitute for second-line injectable (SLI)
intolerance in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), but
the efficacy and safety of this strategy is unknown.
METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate treatment outcomes
for MDR-TB patients who substituted bedaquiline for SLIs. Adults receiving
bedaquiline substitution for MDR-TB therapy, plus a matched control group who did
not receive bedaquiline, were identified from the electronic TB register in the
Western Cape Province, South Africa. The primary outcome measure was the
proportion of patients with death, loss to follow up, or failure to achieve
sustained culture conversion at 12 months of treatment.
RESULTS:Data from 162 patients who received bedaquiline substitution and 168
controls were analyzed; 70.6% were HIV-infected. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in
35/146 (23.9%) patients in the bedaquiline group versus 51/141 (36.2%) in the
control group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.95).
The number of patients with culture reversion was lower in those receiving
bedaquiline (1 patient, 0.8%) compared to controls (12 patients, 10.3%; P =
0.001). Delayed initiation of bedaquiline was independently associated with
failure to achieve sustained culture conversion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95%
CI, 1.1 – 1.9, for every 30-day delay). Mortality was similar at 12 months (11
deaths in each group; P = 0.973).
CONCLUSIONS:Substituting bedaquiline for SLIs in MDR-TB treatment resulted in
improved outcomes at 12 months compared with patients who remained on SLIs,
supporting the use of bedaquiline for MDR-TB treatment in programmatic settings.

Read full article here.

4. Using routinely collected laboratory data to identify high rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis burden communities in the Western Cape Province, South Africa: A retrospective spatiotemporal analysis.
PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 21;15(8):e1002638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002638. eCollection 2018 Aug.
McIntosh AI(1), Jenkins HE(1), White LF(1), Barnard M(2), Thomson DR(3), Dolby T(2), Simpson J(2), Streicher EM(4), Kleinman MB(5), Ragan EJ(5), van Helden PD(4), Murray MB(3), Warren RM(4), Jacobson KR(5).

BACKGROUND:South Africa has the highest tuberculosis incidence globally (781/100,000), with an estimated 4.3% of cases being rifampicin resistant (RR). Control and elimination strategies will require detailed spatial information to understand where drug-resistant tuberculosis exists and why it persists in those communities. We demonstrate a method to enable drug-resistant tuberculosis monitoring by identifying high-burden communities in the Western Cape Province using routinely collected laboratory data.
METHODS AND FINDINGS:We retrospectively identified cases of microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis and RR-tuberculosis from all biological samples submitted for tuberculosis testing (n = 2,219,891) to the Western Cape National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013. Because the NHLS database lacks unique patient identifiers, we performed a series of record-linking processes to match specimen records to individual patients. We counted an individual as having a single disease episode if their positive samples came from within two years of each other. Cases were aggregated by clinic location (n= 302) to estimate the percentage of tuberculosis cases with rifampicin resistance per clinic. We used inverse distance weighting (IDW) to produce heatmaps of the RR-tuberculosis percentage across the province. Regression was used to estimate annual changes in the RR-tuberculosis percentage  by clinic, and estimated average size and direction of change was mapped. We
identified 799,779 individuals who had specimens submitted from mappable clinics  for testing, of whom 222,735 (27.8%) had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. The study population was 43% female, the median age was 36 years (IQR 27-44), and 10,255 (4.6%, 95% CI: 4.6-4.7) cases had documented rifampicin resistance. Among individuals with microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis, 8,947 (4.0%) had more than one disease episode during the study period. The percentage of tuberculosis cases with rifampicin resistance documented among
these individuals was 11.4% (95% CI: 10.7-12.0). Overall, the percentage of tuberculosis cases that were RR-tuberculosis was spatially heterogeneous, ranging from 0% to 25% across the province. Our maps reveal significant yearly fluctuations in RR-tuberculosis percentages at several locations. Additionally, the directions of change over time in RR-tuberculosis percentage were not uniform. The main limitation of this study is the lack of unique patient identifiers in the NHLS database, rendering findings to be estimates reliant on the accuracy of the person-matching algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS:Our maps reveal striking spatial and temporal heterogeneity in RR-tuberculosis percentages across this province. We demonstrate the potential to monitor RR-tuberculosis spatially and temporally with routinely collected laboratory data, enabling improved resource targeting and more rapid locally appropriate interventions.

Read full article here.

August 2018 Newsletter

NEWS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

 

SAVE THE DATE: FDA Webinar

Please save the date for September 6, 2018 from 8:30-9:30 EST as RESIST-TB invites you to join an exciting webinar on Adequate and Well-Controlled Studies in TB Regimen Development: An FDA Perspective.

This webinar will be presented by Karen Higgins of the Food and Drug Administration.

More information regarding the presentation and connection details to follow. 

WHO RAPID COMMUNICATION: KEY CHANGES TO TREATMENT OF MDR/RR-TB

The World Health Organization (WHO) released a rapid communication ahead of updated, more detailed guidelines on treatment of multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) later in 2018. These improved guidelines are expected to lead to major improvements in treatment and quality of life of MDR-TB patients. The rapid communication announces a priority ranking for medicines available for treatment. This aims to improve access to more effective drugs in countries that currently have low treatment success rates. WHO also announced the forthcoming establishment of a multi-stakeholder Task Force to support national TB programs through the transition of the improved 2018 guidelines.

Click here to read the full communication.

 

PUBLICATIONS

 

1. Outcomes of patients with drug-resistant-tuberculosis treated with bedaquiline-containing regimens and undergoing adjunctive surgery.
 J Infect. 2018 Aug 7. pii: S0163-4453(18)30246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.003. [Epub ahead of print]
Borisov SE(1), D’Ambrosio L(2), Centis R(3), Tiberi S(4), Dheda K(5), Alffenaar JW(6), Amale R(7), Belilowski E(1), Bruchfeld J(8), Canneto B(9), Denholm J(10),  Duarte R(11), Esmail A(5), Filippov A(1), Forsman LD(8), Gaga M(12), Ganatra S(7), Igorevna GA(13), Mastrapa BL(14), Manfrin V(15), Manga S(16), Maryandyshev  A(13), Massard G(17), Montaner PG(18), Mullerpattan J(7), Palmero DJ(18), Pontarelli A(19), Papavasileiou A(20), Pontali E(21), Leyet RR(22), Spanevello A(23), Udwadia ZF(7), Viggiani P(19), Visca D(3), Sotgiu G(24), Migliori GB(25).

OBJECTIVES: No study evaluated the contribution of adjunctive surgery in bedaquiline-treated patients. This study describes treatment outcomes and complications in a cohort of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) cases treated with bedaquiline-containing regimens undergoing surgery.

METHODS: This retrospective observational study recruited patients treated for TB in 12 centres in 9 countries between January 2007 and March 2015. Patients who had surgical indications in a bedaquiline-treated programme-based cohort were selected and surgery-related information was collected. Patient characteristics and surgical indications were described together with type of operation, surgical complications, bacteriological conversion rates, and treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes were evaluated according to the time of surgery.

RESULTS: 57 bedaquiline-exposed cases resistant to a median of 7 drugs had indication for surgery (52 retreatments; 50 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) or pre XDR-TB). Sixty percent of cases initiated bedaquiline treatment following surgery, while 36.4% underwent the bedaquiline regimen before surgery and completed it after the operation. At treatment completion 90% culture-converted with 69.1% achieving treatment success; 21.8% had unfavourable outcomes (20.0% treatment failure, 1.8% lost to follow-up), and 9.1% were still undergoing treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that bedaquiline and surgery can be safely and effectively combined in selected cases with a specific indication.

Read full article here.

 

2. ‘I didn’t know so many people cared about me’: support for patients who interrupt drug-resistant TB treatment.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Sep 1;22(9):1023-1030. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0826.
Snyman L(1), Venables E(2), Trivino Duran L(1), Mohr E(1), Azevedo VD(3), Harmans X(1), Isaakidis P(4).

SETTING: Early interventions for patients who interrupt their treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) are rarely reported and assessed. A novel, patient-centred intervention for patients at risk of loss to follow-up (LTFU) from DR-TB treatment was implemented in Khayelitsha, South Africa, in September 2013.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences and perceptions of patients, key support persons, health care workers (HCWs) and programme managers of a patient-centred model.

DESIGN: This was a qualitative study consisting of 18 in-depth interviews with patients, key support persons, HCWs, key informants and one focus group discussion with HCWs, between July and September 2017. Data were coded and thematically analysed.

RESULTS: The model was well perceived and viewed positively by patients, care providers and programme managers. ‘Normalisation’ and tolerance of occasional treatment interruptions, tracing, tailored management plans and peer support were perceived to be beneficial for retaining patients in care. Although the model was resource-demanding, health workers were convinced that it ‘needs to be sustained,’ and proposed solutions for its standardisation.

CONCLUSION: An intervention based on early tracing of patients who interrupt treatment, peer-delivered counselling and individualised management plans by a multidisciplinary team was considered a beneficial and acceptable model to support patients at risk of LTFU from DR-TB treatment.

Read full article here.

 

3. Resource utilization for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis household contact investigations (A5300/I2003).
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Sep 1;22(9):1016-1022. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0163.
Swindells S(1), Gupta A(2), Kim S(3), Hughes MD(4), Sanchez J(5), Mave V(6), Dawson R(7), Kumarasamy N(8), Comins K(9), Smith B(10), Rustomjee R(10), Naini L(11), Shah NS(12), Hesseling A(13), Churchyard G(14).

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend evaluation of the household contacts (HHCs) of individuals with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB); however, implementation of this policy is challenging.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the resource utilization and operational challenges encountered when identifying and characterizing adult MDR-TB index cases and their HHCs.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of adult MDR-TB index cases and HHCs at 16 clinical research sites in eight countries. Site-level resource utilization was assessed with surveys.

RESULTS: Between October 2015 and April 2016, 308 index cases and 1018 HHCs were  enrolled. Of 280 index cases with sputum collected, 94 were smear-positive (34%,  95%CI 28-39), and of 201 with chest X-rays, 87 had cavitary disease (43%, 95%CI 37-50) after a mean duration of treatment of 8 weeks. Staff required 512 attempts to evaluate the 308 households, with a median time per attempt of 4 h; 77% (95%CI 73-80) of HHCs were at increased risk for TB: 13% were aged <5 years, 8% were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, and 79% were positive on the tuberculin skin test/interferon-gamma release assay. One hundred and twenty-one previously undiagnosed TB cases were identified. Issues identified by site staff
included the complexity of personnel and participant transportation, infection control, personnel safety and management of stigma.

CONCLUSION: HHC investigations can be high yield, but are labor-intensive.

Read full article here.

4. Bedaquiline versus injectable containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Aug 3. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1507821. [Epub ahead of print]
Ionescu AM(1), Mpobela Agnarson A(1), Kambili C(2), Metz L(3), Kfoury J(4), Wang S(5), Williams A(6), Singh V(7), Thomas A(1).

OBJECTIVES: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a major public health challenge with suboptimal treatment outcomes including well documented treatment-related toxicities. We compared the cost effectiveness of bedaquiline containing regimens with injectable containing regimens (short course SCR and long course LCR) in India, Russia, and South Africa.

METHODS: The analysis evaluated direct costs of DR-TB treatment which included drugs, hospitalization, injectable-related adverse event costs and other costs. Scenarios altered regimen costs and choice, SCR/LCR ratio and whether the regimen contains bedaquiline or injectables.

RESULTS: Bedaquiline containing regimens are more cost effective based on cost per treatment success compared with injectable containing regimens, reducing these in SCR by 18-20% and in LCR by 49-54%. Average cost effectiveness ratios (ACERs) of bedaquiline containing regimens are lower. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) is negative. Exclusive use of bedaquiline containing regimens results in approximately 61,000 more patients treated successfully over five years.

CONCLUSIONS: Across all countries, bedaquiline containing regimens are dominant compared to injectable containing regimens, entailing lower treatment costs to achieve better clinical outcomes. This analysis can provide insight and support to both local and global decision makers and public health organizations to allocate efficiently resources to improve patient and public health outcomes.

Read full article here.

July 2018 Newsletter

1. Effect of bedaquiline on mortality in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jul 9. pii: S2213-2600(18)30235-2. doi: 10.1016/S2213 2600(18)30235-2. [Epub ahead of print]
Schnippel K(1), Ndjeka N(2), Maartens G(3), Meintjes G(4), Master I(5), Ismail N(6), Hughes J(7), Ferreira H(8), Padanilam X(9), Romero R(10), Te Riele J(11), Conradie F(12).

BACKGROUND: Addition of bedaquiline to treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was associated with an increased risk of death in a phase 2b clinical trial, resulting in caution from WHO. Following a compassionate access programme and local regulatory approval, the South African National Tuberculosis  Programme began widespread use of bedaquiline in March, 2015, especially among patients with extensively drug resistant tuberculosis for whom no other effective treatment options were available. We aimed to compare mortality in patients on standard regimens with that of patients on regimens including bedaquiline.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed patient data from the South African rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis case register (EDRweb), and identified additional mortality using the national vital statistics register. We  excluded patients who started treatment before July 1, 2014, or after March 31, 2016; patients younger than 15 years or older than 75 years; patients without documented rifampicin resistance, and patients with pre-extensively
drug-resistant tuberculosis (multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with further resistance to a second-line injectable or fluoroquinolone). We compared all-cause mortality between patients who received bedaquiline in treatment regimens and those who did not. Patients who did not receive bedaquiline had kanamycin or capreomycin and moxifloxacin as core medicines in their regimen. We estimated hazard ratios for mortality separately for multidrug-resistant or
rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and adjusted using propensity score quintile strata for the potential confounders of  sex, age, HIV and antiretroviral therapy status, history of prior tuberculosis, valid identification number, and year and province of treatment.
FINDINGS: 24,014 tuberculosis cases were registered in the EDRweb between July 1, 2014, and March 31, 2016. Of these, 19 617 patients initiated treatment and met our analysis eligibility criteria. A bedaquiline-containing regimen was given to  743 (4·0%) of 18 542 patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and 273 (25·4%) of 1075 patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Among 1016 patients who received bedaquiline, 128 deaths (12·6%) were reported, and there were 4612 deaths (24·8%) among 18 601 patients on the standard regimens. Bedaquiline was associated with a reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality for patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·35, 95% CI 0·28-0·46) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (0·26, 0·18-0·38) compared with standard regimens.
INTERPRETATION: Our retrospective cohort analysis of routinely reported data in the context of high HIV and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis prevalence showed that bedaquiline-based treatment regimens were associated with a large reduction in mortality in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis, compared with the standard regimen.
FUNDING: None.

Read abstract here.

2. Treatment and outcomes in children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 11;15(7):e1002591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002591.eCollection 2018 Jul.
Harausz EP(1)(2), Garcia-Prats AJ(1), Law S(3), Schaaf HS(1), Kredo T(4), Seddon  JA(5), Menzies D(3), Turkova A(6), Achar J(7), Amanullah F(8), Barry P(9), Becerra M(10), Chan ED(11), Chan PC(12), Ioana Chiotan D(13), Crossa A(14), Drobac PC(10), Fairlie L(15), Falzon D(16), Flood J(9), Gegia M(17), Hicks RM(18), Isaakidis P(19), Kadri SM(20), Kampmann B(21)(22), Madhi SA(23), Marais E(24), Mariandyshev A(25), Méndez-Echevarría A(26), Moore BK(27), Nargiza P(28), Ozere I(29), Padayatchi N(30), Ur-Rehman S(31), Rybak N(32), Santiago-Garcia B(33), Shah NS(18), Sharma S(34), Shim TS(35), Skrahina A(36), Soriano-Arandes A(37), van den Boom M(38), van der Werf MJ(39), van der Werf TS(40), Williams B(41), Yablokova E(25), Yim JJ(42), Furin J(43), Hesseling AC(1); Collaborative Group for Meta-Analysis of Paediatric Individual Patient Data in MDR-TB.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 32,000 children develop multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB; Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin) each year. Little is known about the optimal treatment for these children.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: To inform the pediatric aspects of the revised World Health Organization (WHO) MDR-TB treatment guidelines, we performed a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis, describing treatment outcomes in children treated for MDR-TB. To identify eligible reports we searched PubMed, LILACS, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PsychINFO, and BioMedCentral databases through 1 October 2014. To identify unpublished data, we reviewed conference abstracts, contacted experts in the field, and requested data through other routes, including at national and international conferences and through organizations working in pediatric MDR-TB. A cohort was eligible for inclusion if it included a minimum of three children (aged <15 years) who were treated for bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed MDR-TB, and if treatment outcomes were reported. The search yielded 2,772 reports; after review, 33 studies were eligible for inclusion, with IPD provided for 28 of these. All data  were from published or unpublished observational cohorts. We analyzed demographic, clinical, and treatment factors as predictors of treatment outcome.In order to obtain adjusted estimates, we used a random-effects multivariable logistic regression (random intercept and random slope, unless specified otherwise) adjusted for the following covariates: age, sex, HIV infection, malnutrition, severe extrapulmonary disease, or the presence of severe disease on chest radiograph. We analyzed data from 975 children from 18 countries; 731 (75%) had bacteriologically confirmed and 244 (25%) had clinically diagnosed MDR-TB. The median age was 7.1 years. Of 910 (93%) children with documented HIV status, 359 (39%) were infected with HIV. When compared to clinically diagnosed patients, children with confirmed MDR-TB were more likely to be older, to be infected with HIV, to be malnourished, and to have severe tuberculosis (TB) on chest radiograph (p < 0.001 for all characteristics). Overall, 764 of 975 (78%) had a successful treatment outcome at the conclusion of therapy: 548/731 (75%) of confirmed and 216/244 (89%) of clinically diagnosed children (absolute difference 14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8%-19%, p < 0.001). Treatment was successful in only 56% of children with bacteriologically confirmed TB who were infected with HIV who did not receive any antiretroviral treatment (ART) during MDR-TB therapy, compared to 82% in children infected with HIV who received ART during MDR-TB therapy (absolute difference 26%, 95% CI 5%-48%, p = 0.006). In children with confirmed MDR-TB, the use of second-line injectable agents and high-dose isoniazid (15-20 mg/kg/day) were associated with treatment success (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.9, 95% CI 1.0-8.3, p = 0.041 and aOR 5.9, 95% CI 1.7-20.5, p = 0.007, respectively). These findings for high-dose isoniazid may have been affected by site effect, as the majority of patients came from Cape Town. Limitations of this study include the difficulty of estimating the treatment effects of individual drugs within multidrug regimens, only observational cohort studies were available for inclusion, and treatment decisions were based on the clinician’s perception of illness, with resulting potential for bias.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that children respond favorably to MDR-TB treatment. The low success rate in children infected with HIV who did not receive ART during their MDR-TB treatment highlights the need for ART in these children.  Our findings of individual drug effects on treatment outcome should be further evaluated.

Read full study here. 

3. Relative bioavailability of bedaquiline tablets suspended in water: implications for dosing in children.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 27. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13696. [Epub ahead of print]
Svensson EM(1)(2), du Bois J(3), Kitshoff R(3), de Jager VR(3), Wiesner L(4), Norman J(4), Nachman S(5), Smith B(6), Diacon A(3), Hesseling AC(7), Garcia-Prats AJ(7).

OBJECTIVES: Bedaquiline is an important novel drug for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, but no paediatric formulation is yet available. This work aimed to explore the possibility of using the existing tablet formulation in children by evaluating the relative bioavailability, short-term safety, acceptability and palatability of suspended bedaquiline tablets compared  to whole tablets.
METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-period cross-over study was conducted in 24 healthy adult volunteers. Rich pharmacokinetic sampling over 48 hours was conducted at two occasions 14 days apart in each participant after administration of 400 mg bedaquiline (whole or suspended in water). The pharmacokinetic data were analysed with nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. A questionnaire was used to assess palatability and acceptability.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the bioavailability of the suspended bedaquiline tables compared to whole. The nonparametric 95% confidence interval of the relative bioavailability of suspended bedaquiline tablets was 94-108% of that of whole bedaquiline tablets; hence the predefined bioequivalence criteria were fulfilled. There were no Grade 3 or 4 or serious treatment emergent adverse events recorded in the study and no apparent differences between whole tablets and suspension regarding taste, texture or smell.
CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of bedaquiline tablets suspended in water was the same as for tablets swallowed whole and the suspension was well tolerated. This suggests that the currently available bedaquiline formulation could be used to treat MDR-TB in children, to bridge the gap between when paediatric dosing regimens have been established and when a paediatric dispersible formulation is routinely available.

Read full study here.

4. Increased Doses Lead to Higher Drug Exposures of Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Tuberculosis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 16. pii: AAC.00770-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00770-18. [Epub ahead of print]
Peloquin CA(1), Phillips PPJ(2)(3), Mitnick CD(4), Eisenach K(5), Patientia RF(6), Lecca L(7), Gotuzzo E(8), Gandhi NR(9), Butler D(10), Diacon AH(6), Martel B(7), Santillan J(8), Hunt KR(10), Vargas D(7), von Groote-Bidlingmaier F(6), Seas C(8), Dianis N(10), Moreno-Martinez A(11)(12), Kaur P(13), Horsburgh CR Jr(13)(14).

Patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru and South Africa were randomized to weight-banded nominal doses of 11, 14, 17 or 20 mg/kg/day levofloxacin (minimum 750 mg) in combination with other second-line agents. 101 patients were included in noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses. Respective median AUC0-24 were 109.49, 97.86, 145.33 and 207.04 h*mcg/ml. Median Cmax were 11.90, 12.02, 14.86, and 19.17 mcg/ml. Higher levofloxacin doses, up to 1500 mg daily, resulted in higher exposures. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01918397.

Read manuscript here.

5. Can patients afford the cost of treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Ethiopia?
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):905-911. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0837.
Collins D(1), Beyene D(2), Tedla Y(3), Mesfin H(4), Diro E(5).

SETTING: Ethiopia has a high prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) and is one of the countries with the highest burden of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB).
OBJECTIVE: To understand the costs that patients incur in obtaining diagnosis and treatment  for MDR-TB.
DESIGN: In March 2013, interviews were conducted with 169 MDR-TB patients at three hospitals in Ethiopia to identify the cost to patients and the impact on employment and family income.
RESULTS: The average MDR-TB patient incurred a total cost of US$1378, which represented 25 months of a mid-treatment household income of US$54. The impact on the patient’s employment and on overall patient and family income was generally catastrophic: 74% of all respondents reported losing their jobs, 66% of patients lost household income, and household income was reduced by 38%. To help cover the costs, 38% of patients sold some type of property, while 7% leased out property and 41% took out loans, any of which could jeopardize their future financial situation even further.
CONCLUSION: Despite services being officially free of charge, most patients incurred catastrophic costs and suffered significant income loss as a result of obtaining diagnosis and treatment for MDR-TB.

Read abstract here.

June 2018 Newsletter

1. Mortality and associated factors of patients with extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis: an emerging public health crisis in China.
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3169-7.
Bei C(1), Fu M(2), Zhang Y(3), Xie H(2), Yin K(2), Liu Y(2), Zhang L(4), Xie B(4), Li F(5), Huang H(6), Liu Y(7), Yang L(2), Zhou J(2).

BACKGROUND: Limited treatment options of extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) have led to its high mortality worldwide. Relevant data about mortality  of XDR-TB patients in literature are limited and likely underestimate the real situation in China, since the majority of patients with XDR-TB are lost to follow-up after discharge from TB hospitals. In this study, we sought to investigate the mortality and associated risk factors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-negative patients with XDR-TB in China.
METHODS: All patients who were diagnosed with XDR-TB for the first time in four TB care centers across China between March 2013 and February 2015 were consecutively enrolled. Active tracking through contacting patients or family members by phone or home visit was conducted to obtain patients’ survival information by February 2017. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with mortality.
RESULTS: Among 67 patients enrolled, the mean age was 48.7 (Standard Deviation [SD] = 16.7) years, and 51 (76%) were men. Fourteen patients (21%) were treatment naïve at diagnosis indicating primary transmission. 58 (86.8%) patients remained positive for sputum smear or culture when discharged. During a median follow-up period of 32 months, 20 deaths occurred, with an overall mortality of 128 per 1000 person-years. Among patients who were dead, the median survival was 5.4 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.2-17.8). Seventeen (85%) of them died at home, among whom the median interval from discharge to death was 8.4 months (IQR:
2.0-18.2). In Cox proportional hazards regression models, body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-15.7), smoking (aHR = 4.7, 95%CI:1.7-13.2), or a clinically significant comorbidity including heart, lung, liver, or renal disorders or auto-immune diseases (aHR = 3.5, 95%CI: 1.3-9.4), were factors independently associated with increased mortality.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggested an alarming situation of XDR-TB patients in China with a sizable proportion of newly transmitted cases, a high mortality rate, and a long period in community. This observation calls for urgent actions to improve XDR-TB case management in China, including providing regimens with high chances of cure and palliative care, and enhanced infection control measures.

Read full text here.

2. Drug Penetration Gradients Associated with Acquired Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis Patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun 7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201711-2333OC. [Epub ahead of print]
Dheda K(1), Lenders L(1), Magombedze G(2), Srivastava S(2), Raj P(3), Arning E(2), Ashcraft P(4), Bottiglieri T(5), Wainwright H(1), Pennel T(1), Linegar A(1), Moodley L(1), Pooran A(6), Pasipanodya JG(7), Sirgel FA(8), van Helden PD(9), Wakeland E(3), Warren RM(10), Gumbo T(11).

RATIONALE: Acquired resistance is an important driver of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, even with good treatment adherence. However, exactly what initiates the resistance, and how it arises remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the relationship between drug concentrations and drug susceptibility readouts (MICs) in the tuberculosis cavity.
METHODS: We recruited patients with medically incurable tuberculosis who were undergoing therapeutic lung resection whilst on treatment with the cocktail of second line anti-tuberculosis drugs. On the day of surgery antibiotic concentrations were measured in the blood and at seven pre-specified biopsy sites within each cavity. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was grown from each biopsy site, MICs of each drug identified, and whole genome sequencing performed. Spearman correlation coefficients between drug concentration and MIC were calculated.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients treated for a median of 13 (range: 5-31) months were recruited. MICs and drug resistance-associated single nucleotide variants differed between the different geospatial locations within each cavity, and with  pretreatment and serial sputum isolates, consistent with ongoing acquisition of resistance. However, pre-treatment sputum MIC had an accuracy of only 49.48% in predicting cavitary MICs. There were large concentration-distance gradients for each antibiotic. The location-specific concentrations inversely correlated with
MICs (p<0.05), and therefore acquired resistance. Moreover, pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic exposures known to amplify drug-resistant subpopulations were encountered in all positions.
CONCLUSIONS: These data inform interventional strategies relevant to drug delivery, dosing, and diagnostics to prevent the development of acquired resistance. The role of high intracavitary penetration as a biomarker of antibiotic efficacy, when assessing new regimens, requires clarification.

Read full text here.

3. Clinical and cardiac safety of long-term levofloxacin in children treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 16. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy416. [Epub ahead of print]
Garcia-Prats AJ(1), Draper HR(1), Finlayson H(2), Winckler J(1), Burger A(3), Fourie B(2), Thee S(4), Hesseling AC(1), Schaaf HS(1).

Safety concerns persist for long-term pediatric fluoroquinolone use. Seventy children (median age 2.1 years) treated with levofloxacin 10-20 mg/kg once daily  for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (median observation time 11.8 months) had few musculoskeletal events, no levofloxacin-attributed serious adverse events, and no QTcF >450 ms. Long-term levofloxacin was safe and well tolerated.

Read full text here.

4. Drug Penetration Gradients Associated with Acquired Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis Patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun 7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201711-2333OC. [Epub ahead of print]
Dheda K(1), Lenders L(1), Magombedze G(2), Srivastava S(2), Raj P(3), Arning E(2), Ashcraft P(4), Bottiglieri T(5), Wainwright H(1), Pennel T(1), Linegar A(1), Moodley L(1), Pooran A(6), Pasipanodya JG(7), Sirgel FA(8), van Helden PD(9), Wakeland E(3), Warren RM(10), Gumbo T(11).

RATIONALE: Acquired resistance is an important driver of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, even with good treatment adherence. However, exactly what initiates the resistance, and how it arises remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the relationship between drug concentrations and drug susceptibility readouts (MICs) in the tuberculosis cavity.
METHODS: We recruited patients with medically incurable tuberculosis who were undergoing therapeutic lung resection whilst on treatment with the cocktail of second line anti-tuberculosis drugs. On the day of surgery antibiotic concentrations were measured in the blood and at seven pre-specified biopsy sites within each cavity. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was grown from each biopsy site, MICs of each drug identified, and whole genome sequencing performed. Spearman correlation coefficients between drug concentration and MIC were calculated.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients treated for a median of 13 (range: 5-31) months were recruited. MICs and drug resistance-associated single nucleotide variants differed between the different geospatial locations within each cavity, and with pretreatment and serial sputum isolates, consistent with ongoing acquisition of resistance. However, pre-treatment sputum MIC had an accuracy of only 49.48% in predicting cavitary MICs. There were large concentration-distance gradients for each antibiotic. The location-specific concentrations inversely correlated with
MICs (p<0.05), and therefore acquired resistance. Moreover, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures known to amplify drug-resistant subpopulations were encountered in all positions.
CONCLUSIONS: These data inform interventional strategies relevant to drug delivery, dosing, and diagnostics to prevent the development of acquired resistance. The role of high intracavitary penetration as a biomarker of antibiotic efficacy, when assessing new regimens, requires clarification.

Read full text here. 

5. Comparison of the validity of smear and culture conversion as a prognostic marker of treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0197880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197880. eCollection 2018.
Alene KA(1)(2), Viney K(1)(3), Yi H(4), McBryde ES(5), Yang K(4), Bai L(6), Gray DJ(1), Xu Z(7), Clements ACA(1).

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has conditionally recommended the use of sputum smear microscopy and culture examination for the monitoring of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. We aimed to assess and compare the validity of smear and culture conversion at different time points during treatment for MDR-TB, as a prognostic marker for end-of-treatment outcomes.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study using data obtained from Hunan Chest Hospital, China and Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia. The sensitivity and specificity of culture and sputum smear conversion for predicting treatment outcomes were analysed using a random-effects generalized linear mixed model.
RESULTS: A total of 429 bacteriologically confirmed MDR-TB patients with a culture and smear positive result were included. Overall, 345 (80%) patients had a successful treatment outcome, and 84 (20%) patients had poor treatment outcomes. The sensitivity of smear and culture conversion to predict a successful treatment outcome were: 77.9% and 68.9% at 2 months after starting treatment (difference between tests, p = 0.007); 95.9% and 92.7% at 4 months (p = 0.06); 97.4% and 96.2% at 6 months (p = 0.386); and 99.4% and 98.9% at 12 months (p = 0.412), respectively. The specificity of smear and culture non-conversion to predict a poor treatment outcome were: 41.6% and 60.7% at 2 months (p = 0.012); 23.8% and 48.8% at 4 months (p<0.001); and 20.2% and 42.8% at 6 months (p<0.001); and 15.4% and 32.1% (p<0.001) at 12 months, respectively. The sensitivity of culture and smear conversion increased as the month of conversion increased but at the cost of decreased specificity. The optimum time points after conversion to provide the best prognostic marker of a successful treatment outcome were between two and four months after treatment commencement for smear, and between four and six months for culture. The common optimum time point for smear and culture conversion was four months. At this time point, culture conversion (AUROC curve = 0.71) was significantly better than smear conversion (AUROC curve = 0.6) in predicting successful treatment outcomes (p < 0.001). However, the validity of smear conversion (AUROC curve = 0.7) was equivalent to culture conversion (AUROC curve = 0.71) in predicting treatment outcomes when demographic and clinical factors were included in the model. The positive and negative predictive values
for smear conversion were: 57.3% and 65.7% at two months, 55.7% and 85.4% at four months, and 55.0% and 88.6% at six months; and for culture conversions it was: 63.7% and 66.2% at two months, 64.4% and 87.1% at four months, and 62.7% and 91.9% at six months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The validity of smear conversion is significantly lower than culture conversion in predicting MDR-TB treatment outcomes. We support the WHO recommendation of using both smear and culture examination rather than smear alone for the monitoring of MDR-TB patients for a better prediction of successful treatment outcomes. The optimum time points to predict a future successful treatment outcome were between two and four months after treatment commencement for sputum smear conversion and between four and six months for culture conversion. The common optimum times for culture and smear conversion together was four months.

Read full text here.

May 2018 Newsletter

1. Linezolid-Containing Treatment Regimens for Tuberculosis in Children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002093. [Epub ahead of print]
Prieto LM, Santiago B(1), Del Rosal T(2), Carazo B(3), Jiménez AB(4), Pérez-Gorricho B(5), Rubio F(6), Tagarro A(7), Blázquez D(8), Moreno-Pérez D(3), Mellado MJ(2), Baquero-Artigao F(2); Spanish Paediatric TB Research Network (pTBred).

BACKGROUND: In recent years there is an increasing interest in the use of linezolid for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB).
METHODS: Patients under 18 years of age who received linezolid within the Spanish Pediatric TB Network (pTBred) from 2001 to 2016 were retrospectively included. Treatment characteristics, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifteen children were included (53% male) with a median age of 3.6 years (IQR: 1.6-6.2). Median follow up was 54 months (IQR: 38-76). The reasons for linezolid use were drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) in eight (53%) patients, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in five (33%) patients and chronic liver disease (CLD) in two (13%) patients. Four children (26%) were on immunosuppressive therapy when TB was diagnosed. Five children (33%) were diagnosed with extrapulmonary TB. The median duration of linezolid treatment was 13 months (IQR: 7.5-17). Nine patients had 13 linezolid-related AEs. Hematologic toxicity was observed in eight patients (53%) and gastrointestinal intolerance in 3 patients (20%). In two patients linezolid dose was reduced and in two patients linezolid was discontinued because of AEs. A 2- year-old girl went back to her country of birth and was lost to follow-up. No relapses were observed among the other 14 patients (93%).
CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid may be considered when treating children with drug resistant TB but also in the cases of patients with chronic liver disease or drug induced liver injury. However, AEs should be closely monitored. Further studies are needed to determine the optimum dosage and the optimal duration of linezolid treatment in children.

Read abstract here.

2. Long Term Bedaquiline-Related Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis from South Africa.
Eur Respir J. 2018 May 3. pii: 1800544. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00544-2018. [Epub ahead of print]
Olayanju O(1), Limberis J(1), Esmail A(1), Oelofse S(1), Gina P(1), Pietersen E(1), Fadul M(1), Warren R(2), Dheda K(1).

EXTRACT: The persistence of the multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) epidemic threatens to destabilise TB control [1, 2]. MDR-TB is defined as a TB strain with resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin. In 2016 ∼600 000 new cases of MDR- or rifampicin-resistant TB were estimated to have occurred globally. Detection rates have more than doubled in several countries such as China, India and Russia in the last several years, and almost 20% of Mycobacterium tuberculosisisolates globally are now resistant to at least one first or second line anti-TB drug [3]. Approximately 10% of global MDR-TB strains are thought to be extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), which is MDR-TB with additional resistance to a fluoroquinolone and a second line injectable drug.

Read extract here.

3. Prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis and imputed burden in South Africa: a
national and sub-national cross-sectional survey.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 20. pii: S1473-3099(18)30222-6. doi:
10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30222-6. [Epub ahead of print]
Ismail NA(1), Mvusi L(2), Nanoo A(3), Dreyer A(3), Omar SV(3), Babatunde S(4), Molebatsi T(2), van der Walt M(5), Adelekan A(6), Deyde V(6), Ihekweazu C(3), Madhi SA(7).

BACKGROUND: Globally, per-capita, South Africa reports a disproportionately high number of cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis. We sought to estimate the prevalence of resistance to tuberculosis drugs in newly diagnosed and retreated patients with tuberculosis provincially and nationally, and compared these with the 2001-02 estimates.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done between June 15, 2012-June 14, 2014, using population proportionate randomised cluster sampling in the nine provinces in South Africa. 343 clusters were included, ranging between 31 and 48 per province. A patient was eligible for inclusion in the survey if he or she presented as a presumptive case during the intake period at a drug resistance survey enrolling facility. Consenting participants (≥18 years old) completed a questionnaire and had a sputum sample tested for resistance to first-line and second-line drugs. Analysis was by logistic regression with robust SEs, inverse probability weighted against routine data, and estimates were derived using a random effects model.
FINDINGS: 101 422 participants were tested in 2012-14. Nationally, the prevalence of MDR tuberculosis was 2·1% (95% CI 1·5-2·7) among new tuberculosis cases and 4·6% (3·2-6·0) among retreatment cases. The provincial point prevalence of MDR tuberculosis ranged between 1·6% (95% CI 0·9-2·9) and 5·1% (3·7-7·0). Overall, the prevalence of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (4·6%, 95% CI 3·5-5·7) was higher than the prevalence of MDR tuberculosis (2·8%, 2·0-3·6; p=0·01). Comparing the current survey with the previous (2001-02) survey, the overall MDR tuberculosis prevalence was 2·8% versus 2·9% and prevalance of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis was 3·4% versus 1·8%, respectively. The prevalence of isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis was above 5% in all provinces. The prevalence of ethionamide and pyrazinamide resistance among MDR tuberculosis cases was 44·7% (95% CI 25·9-63·6) and 59·1% (49·0-69·1), respectively. The prevalence of XDR tuberculosis was 4·9% (95% CI 1·0-8·8). Nationally, the estimated numbers of cases of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, MDR tuberculosis, and isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis for 2014 were 13 551, 8249, and 17 970, respectively.
INTERPRETATION: The overall prevalence of MDR tuberculosis in South Africa in 2012-14 was similar to that in 2001-02; however, prevalence of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis almost doubled among new cases. Furthermore, the high prevalence of isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis, not routinely screened for, and resistance to second-line drugs has implications for empirical management.
FUNDING: President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the terms of 1U19GH000571.

Read abstract here.

4. Pan-tuberculosis regimens: an argument for.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):239-240. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30096-1.
Wallis RS(1), Cohen T(2), Menzies NA(3), Churchyard G(4).

ABSTRACT: 600,000 cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis, causing 240 000 deaths, were estimated by WHO to have occurred worldwide in 2016.1 Cases are expected to increase over the next two decades, driven by the low likelihood that patients will initiate appropriate treatment and, in those who do, the low probability that treatment will succeed.2 Experience in Africa has highlighted the scope and complexity of this problem. In South Africa, where the Xpert MTB/RIF test has fully replaced sputum acid-fast bacilli smear for tuberculosis diagnosis, 59% of rifampicin-resistant patients have additional resistance to second-line drugs (eg, kanamycin, ethionamide, and ofloxacin).

Read abstract here.

5. Pan-tuberculosis regimens: an argument against.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):240-242. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30097-3.
Dheda K(1), Gumbo T(2), Lange C(3), Horsburgh CR Jr(4), Furin J(5).

ABSTRACT: In 1986, after publication of a seminal paper about the use of short-course regimens for tuberculosis treatment, there was great optimism that a universal regimen for tuberculosis had been discovered.1Pierre Chaulet described the short-course regimens as “highly effective and reliable with the minimum of constraints either for patients or for health personnel.”2 Unfortunately, the emergence of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains soon rendered these short-course regimens ineffective for many individuals.

Read abstract here.

APRIL 2018 NEWSLETTER

1. MDR-TB patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Cost-effectiveness of 5 models of care.

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0196003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196003. eCollection 2018.

Loveday M(1)(2), Wallengren K(3), Reddy T(4), Besada D(1), Brust JCM(5), Voce A(6), Desai H(7), Ngozo J(8), Radebe Z(8), Master I(9), Padayatchi N(2), Daviaud E(1).

BACKGROUND: South Africa has a high burden of MDR-TB, and to provide accessible treatment the government has introduced different models of care. We report the most cost-effective model after comparing cost per patient successfully treated across 5 models of care: centralized hospital, district hospitals (2), and community-based care through clinics or mobile injection teams.

METHODS: In an observational study five cohorts were followed prospectively. The cost analysis adopted a provider perspective and economic cost per patient successfully treated was calculated based on country protocols and length of treatment per patient per model of care. Logistic regression was used to calculate propensity score weights, to compare pairs of treatment groups, whilst adjusting for baseline imbalances between groups. Propensity score weighted costs and treatment success rates were used in the ICER analysis. Sensitivity analysis

focused on varying treatment success and length of hospitalization within each model.

RESULTS: In 1,038 MDR-TB patients 75% were HIV-infected and 56% were successfully treated. The cost per successfully treated patient was 3 to 4.5 times lower in the community-based models with no hospitalization. Overall, the Mobile model was the most cost-effective.

CONCLUSION: Reducing the length of hospitalization and following community-based models of care improves the affordability of MDR-TB treatment without compromising its effectiveness.

Read free PLOS article here

 

2. Early experience with delamanid-containing regimens in the treatment of complicated multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Hong Kong.

Eur Respir J. 2018 Apr 12. pii: 1800159. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00159-2018. [Epub  ahead of print]

Chang KC(1), Chung-Ching Leung E(2), Law WS(2), Leung WM(2), Tai LB(2), Lee SN(2), Lam FM(3), Chau CH(3), Yun-Wing Mok T(4), Yew WW(5), Leung CC(2).

EXTRACT: Hong Kong is a tuberculosis (TB) intermediate-burden region with a disease notification rate of 60.5 per 100 000 population in 2015. With the use of supervised treatment since 1970s, and the use of drug susceptibility testing (DST) for guiding use of TB drugs for several decades, TB drug resistance rates in Hong Kong have declined and the multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB rate has been kept at around 1%. Successful control of MDR-TB was partly attributable to judicious use of ofloxacin and later levofloxacin in the 1990s, the introduction of linezolid in 2000s among patients with fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant MDR-TB or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB, with intermittent dosing to enable its prolonged use, and selective use of delamanid among patients with complicated MDR-TB since 2012. To echo our support for using delamanid in the treatment of MDR-TB, we would like to report our early experience in Hong Kong regarding the use of delamanid-containing regimens among patients with pre-XDR-TB (MDR-TB with bacillary resistance to either FQ or second-line injectable agents) or XDR-TB.

Read extract here

 

3. Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):265-275. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30078-X.

Fregonese F(1), Ahuja SD(2), Akkerman OW(3), Arakaki-Sanchez D(4), Ayakaka I(5), Baghaei P(6), Bang D(7), Bastos M(8), Benedetti A(9), Bonnet M(10), Cattamanchi A(11), Cegielski P(12), Chien JY(13), Cox H(14), Dedicoat M(15), Erkens C(16), Escalante P(17), Falzon D(18), Garcia-Prats AJ(19), Gegia M(18), Gillespie SH(20), Glynn JR(21), Goldberg S(22), Griffith D(23), Jacobson KR(24), Johnston JC(25), Jones-López EC(24), Khan A(22), Koh WJ(26), Kritski A(27), Lan ZY(9), Lee JH(28), Li PZ(1), Maciel EL(29), Galliez RM(30), Merle CSC(31), Munang M(15), Narendran G(32), Nguyen VN(33), Nunn A(21), Ohkado A(34), Park JS(28), Phillips PPJ(35), Ponnuraja C(36), Reves R(37), Romanowski K(38), Seung K(39), Schaaf HS(19), Skrahina A(40), Soolingen DV(41), Tabarsi P(6), Trajman A(42), Trieu L(2), Banurekha VV(32), Viiklepp P(43), Wang JY(13), Yoshiyama T(44), Menzies D(45).

BACKGROUND: Isoniazid-resistant, rifampicin-susceptible (INH-R) tuberculosis is the most common form of drug resistance, and is associated with failure, relapse, and acquired rifampicin resistance if treated with first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. The aim of the study was to compare success, mortality, and acquired rifampicin resistance in patients with INH-R pulmonary tuberculosis given different durations of rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (REZ); a fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ; and streptomycin plus a core regimen of REZ.

METHODS: Studies with regimens and outcomes known for individual patients with INH-R tuberculosis were eligible, irrespective of the number of patients if randomised trials, or with at least 20 participants if a cohort study. Studies were identified from two relevant systematic reviews, an updated search of one of the systematic reviews (for papers published between April 1, 2015, and Feb 10, 2016), and personal communications. Individual patient data were obtained from authors of eligible studies. The individual patient data meta-analysis was performed with propensity score matched logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and risk differences of treatment success (cure or treatment completion), death during treatment, and acquired rifampicin resistance. Outcomes were measured across different treatment regimens to assess the effects of: different durations of REZ (≤6 months vs >6 months); addition of a fluoroquinolone to REZ (fluoroquinolone plus 6 months or more of REZ vs 6 months  or more of REZ); and addition of streptomycin to REZ (streptomycin plus 6 months of rifampicin and ethambutol and 1-3 months of pyrazinamide vs 6 months or more of REZ). The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

FINDINGS: Individual patient data were requested for 57 cohort studies and 17 randomised trials including 8089 patients with INH-R tuberculosis. We received 33 datasets with 6424 patients, of which 3923 patients in 23 studies received regimens related to the study objectives. Compared with a daily regimen of 6 months of (H)REZ (REZ with or without isoniazid), extending the duration to 8-9 months had similar outcomes; as such, 6 months or more of (H)REZ was used for subsequent comparisons. Addition of a fluoroquinolone to 6 months or more of (H)REZ was associated with significantly greater treatment success (aOR 2·8, 95%  CI 1·1-7·3), but no significant effect on mortality (aOR 0·7, 0·4-1·1) or acquired rifampicin resistance (aOR 0·1, 0·0-1·2). Compared with 6 months or more of (H)REZ, the standardised retreatment regimen (2 months of streptomycin, 3 months of pyrazinamide, and 8 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol) was associated with significantly worse treatment success (aOR 0·4, 0·2-0·7). The quality of the evidence was very low for all outcomes and treatment regimens assessed, owing to the observational nature of most of the data, the diverse settings, and the imprecision of estimates.

INTERPRETATION: In patients with INH-R tuberculosis, compared with treatment with at least 6 months of daily REZ, addition of a fluoroquinolone was associated with better treatment success, whereas addition of streptomycin was associated with less treatment success; however, the quality of the evidence was very low. These results support the conduct of randomised trials to identify the optimum regimen  for this important and common form of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

FUNDING: World Health Organization and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Read abstract here

 

lobal programmatic use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Apr 1;22(4):407-412. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0706.

Cox V(1), Brigden G(2), Crespo RH(3), Lessem E(4), Lynch S(5), Rich ML(6), Waning B(3), Furin J(7).

SETTING: The World Health Organization recommended two new drugs, bedaquiline (BDQ) and delamanid (DLM), for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis  (MDR-TB) in 2013 and 2014, respectively. An estimated one third of patients with MDR-TB would benefit from the inclusion of these drugs in their treatment regimens.

DESIGN: A convenience sample of 36 countries voluntarily reported monthly data on cumulative programmatic use of new drugs to the Drug-Resistant TB Scale-Up Treatment Action Team between 1 July 2015 and 31 June 2017. Programmatic use was defined as treatment for MDR-TB with newer drugs outside of clinical trials or compassionate use.

RESULTS: A total of 10 164 persons were started on BDQ and 688 started on DLM during the reporting period. Only 15.7% of the 69 213 persons estimated to need newer drugs over the study period were reported to have received them.

CONCLUSION: While there has been significant progress in some countries, uptake of the newer drugs has not kept pace with a conservative estimate of need; fewer than 20% of persons likely to benefit from either BDQ or DLM have received them. Concerted efforts are needed to ensure that the newer drugs are made available more widely for persons with MDR-TB in need of these therapeutic options.

Read abstract here

 

5. Treatment responses in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Apr 1;22(4):399-406. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0741.

Heyckendorf J(1), van Leth F(2), Avsar K(3), Glattki G(4), Günther G(5), Kalsdorf B(1), Müller M(6), Olaru ID(7), Rolling T(8), Salzer HJF(1), Schuhmann M(9), Terhalle E(1), Lange C(10).

BACKGROUND: Excellent treatment outcomes have recently been reported for patients with multi/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) in settings where optimal resources for individualised therapy are available.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether differences remain in treatment responses between patients with M/XDR-TB and those with non-M/XDR-TB.

METHOD: Patients with TB were prospectively enrolled between March 2013 and March 2016 at five hospitals in Germany. Treatment was conducted following current guidelines and individualised on the basis of drug susceptibility testing. Two-month and 6-month sputum smear and sputum culture conversion rates were assessed. A clinical and radiological score were used to assess response to anti-tuberculosis treatment.

RESULTS: Non-M/XDR-TB (n = 29) and M/XDR-TB (n = 46) patients showed similar rates of microbiological conversion: 2-month smear conversion rate, 90% vs. 78%;  culture conversion rate, 67% vs. 61%; time to smear conversion, 19 days (IQR 10-32) vs. 31 days (IQR 14-56) (P = 0.066); time to culture conversion, 39 days (IQR 17-67) vs. 39 days (IQR 6-85) (P = 0.191). Both clinical and radiological scores decreased after the introduction of anti-tuberculosis treatment.

CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in scores between the two groups until 6 months of treatment. Under optimal clinical conditions, with the availability of novel diagnostics and a wide range of therapeutic options for individualised treatment, patients with M/XDR-TB achieved 6-month culture conversion rates that were compatible with those in patients with non-M/XDR-TB.

Read abstract here

MARCH 2018 NEWSLETTER

1. Precision medicine for drug-resistant tuberculosis in high-burden countries: is individualised treatment desirable and feasible?

Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 13. pii: S1473-3099(18)30104-X. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30104-X. [Epub ahead of print]

Cox H(1), Hughes J(2), Black J(3), Nicol MP(4).

ABSTRACT: Treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis is largely delivered through standardised, empirical combination regimens in low-resource, high-burden settings. However, individualised treatment, guided by detailed drug susceptibility testing, probably results in improved individual outcomes and is the standard of care in well-resourced settings. Driven by the urgent need to scale up treatment provision, new tuberculosis drugs, incorporated into standardised regimens, are being tested. Although standardised regimens are expected to improve access to treatment in high-burden settings, they are also likely to contribute to the emergence of resistance, even with good clinical management. We argue that a balance is required between the need to improve treatment access and the imperative to minimise resistance amplification and provide the highest standard of care, through a precision medicine approach. In tuberculosis, as in other diseases, we should aim to reduce the entrenched inequalities that manifest as different standards of care in different settings.

Read abstract here.

 

2. Bedaquiline and Delamanid for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Multi-center Cohort Study in Korea.

Eur Respir J. 2018 Mar 15. pii: 1702467. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02467-2017. [Epub ahead of print]

Tae Kim C(1), Kim TO(2), Shin HJ(2), Chun Ko Y(3), Hun Choe Y(4), Kim HR(5), Kwon YS(2).

ABSTRACT: Relatively little is known about the efficacy and safety of the programmatic use of bedaquiline and delamanid in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. This study evaluated 61 patients with MDR-TB treated with bedaquiline (n=39), delamanid (n=11), or both, either sequentially (n=10) or in co-administration (n=1), for more than 1 month, combined with a World Health Organization-recommended regimen. Of these, 49 (80.3%) were men and 12 (19.7%) were women. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR]=38.5-61.0 years). Forty-two (68.9%) patients had fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB and 16 (26.2%) had extensively drug-resistant TB. The median duration of treatment with bedaquiline and/or delamanid was 168 days (IQR 166.5-196.5 days), with 33 (54.1%) receiving linezolid for median 673 days (IQR 171-736 days). Of the 55 patients with positive sputum cultures at the start of bedaquiline and/or delamanid treatment, 39 (70.9%) achieved sputum culture conversion within a median of 119 days. Treatment was halted in four patients (6.6%) because of prolonged corrected QT interval. In conclusion, bedaquiline and delamanid were effective and safe for treating MDR-TB, with initial evidence of sequential administration of these two drugs as a viable treatment strategy for patients when an adequate treatment regimen cannot be constructed.

Read abstract here.

 

3. Clinical Management of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in 16 European Countries.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2141OC. [Epub ahead of print]

Günther G(1), van Leth F(2), Alexandru S(3), Altet N(4), Avsar K(5), Bang D(6), Barbuta R(7), Bothamley G(8), Ciobanu A(3), Crudu V(3), Danilovits M(9), Dedicoat M(10), Duarte R(11), Gualano G(12), Kunst H(13), de Lange W(14), Leimane V(15), McLaughlin AM(16), Magis-Escurra C(17), Muylle I(18), Polcová V(19), Popa C(20),  Rumetshofer R(21), Skrahina A(22), Solodovnikova V(23), Spinu V(24), Tiberi S(25), Viiklepp P(26), Lange C(27); for TBNET.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a major burden to public health in Europe. Reported treatment success rates are around 50% or less and cure rates are even lower.

METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study, analyzing management and treatment outcomes stratified by incidence of patients with MDR-TB in Europe. Treatment outcomes were compared by WHO and alternative simplified definitions.

RESULTS: 380 patients with MDR-TB were recruited and followed-up between 2010 and 2014 in 16 European countries. Patients in high-incidence countries compared with low-incidence countries were treated more frequently with standardized regimen (83.2% vs. 9.9%), had delayed treatment initiation (median 111 vs. 28 days), developed more additional drug resistance (23% vs. 5.8%), and had increased mortality (9.4% vs. 1.9%). Only 20.1% of patients using pyrazinamide had proven susceptibility to the drug. Applying WHO outcome definitions, frequency of cure (38.7% vs. 9.7%) was higher in high-incidence countries. Simplified outcome definitions that include one year of follow-up after the end of treatment showed similar frequency of relapse-free cure in low- (58.3%), intermediate- (55.8%) and high- incidence (57.1%) countries, but highest frequency of failure in high-incidence countries (24.1% vs. 14.6).

CONCLUSIONS: Conventional standard MDR-TB treatment regimens resulted in a higher frequency of failure compared to individualized treatments. Overall, cure from MDR-TB is substantially more frequent than previously anticipated, and poorly reflected by WHO outcome definitions.

Read abstract here.

 

4. Global programmatic use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Apr 1;22(4):407-412. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0706.

Cox V(1), Brigden G(2), Crespo RH(3), Lessem E(4), Lynch S(5), Rich ML(6), Waning B(3), Furin J(7).

SETTING: The World Health Organization recommended two new drugs, bedaquiline (BDQ) and delamanid (DLM), for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in 2013 and 2014, respectively. An estimated one third of patients with MDR-TB would benefit from the inclusion of these drugs in their treatment regimens.

DESIGN: A convenience sample of 36 countries voluntarily reported monthly data on cumulative programmatic use of new drugs to the Drug-Resistant TB Scale-Up

Treatment Action Team between 1 July 2015 and 31 June 2017. Programmatic use was defined as treatment for MDR-TB with newer drugs outside of clinical trials or compassionate use.

RESULTS: A total of 10 164 persons were started on BDQ and 688 started on DLM during the reporting period. Only 15.7% of the 69 213 persons estimated to need newer drugs over the study period were reported to have received them.

CONCLUSION: While there has been significant progress in some countries, uptake of the newer drugs has not kept pace with a conservative estimate of need; fewer than 20% of persons likely to benefit from either BDQ or DLM have received them. Concerted efforts are needed to ensure that the newer drugs are made available more widely for persons with MDR-TB in need of these therapeutic options.

Read free downloadable article here.

FEBRUARY 2018 NEWSLETTER

1. Interim outcomes of delamanid for the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB in South Korea.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Feb 1;73(2):503-508. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx373.

Mok J(1), Kang H(2), Hwang SH(2), Park JS(2), Kang B(3), Lee T(4), Koh WJ(5), Yim JJ(6), Jeon D(7).

OBJECTIVES: Delamanid is a new anti-TB drug, but few data exist on its use outside clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy as well as the safety and tolerability of a delamanid-containing regimen for 24 weeks in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients with MDR/XDR-TB who were treated with a delamanid-containing regimen in seven hospitals in South Korea.

RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with MDR-TB, of which 6 (18.8%) were XDR-TB, were included and all completed 24 weeks of delamanid treatment. Of 19 patients (59.4%) who had positive culture sputum at the initiation of delamanid treatment, the proportion of culture conversion at 8 weeks was 72.2% (13 of 18) in solid medium and 50.0% (7 of 14) in liquid medium. The proportion of culture conversion at 24 weeks was 94.4% (17 of 18) in solid medium and 92.9% (13 of 14) in liquid medium. The median time to culture conversion was 33 days (range = 5-81) using solid medium and 57 days (range = 8-96) using liquid medium. Of the 32 patients, there was no serious adverse event or death. Three patients developed a transient QTcF of > 500 ms.

CONCLUSIONS: The use of delamanid combined with optimized background regimens has the potential to achieve high culture conversion rates at 24 weeks with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in patients with MDR/XDR-TB.

Read abstract here.

 

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Model-Based Analysis.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0352-8.

Schnippel K(1), Firnhaber C(2)(3), Conradie F(2), Ndjeka N(4), Sinanovic E(5).

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20,000 people were diagnosed with multi-drug and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) in South Africa in 2015, yet only one-half of the patients who start treatment are expected to have a successful outcome. There is increasing evidence of the effectiveness and safety of new drug regimens containing bedaquiline for MDR/RR-TB; however, whether they are affordable for high-burden, limited-resource settings is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the incremental cost effectiveness of a bedaquiline-based regimen for MDR/RR-TB treatment in South Africa compared with the standard kanamycin-based regimen.

METHODS: We established a Markov model for ambulatory treatment of MDR/RR-TB in a high-HIV prevalence setting, parameterized using clinical outcomes from the South African National TB Programme (SA NTP) before (2012-2014) and after (2015-2016) bedaquiline roll-out. The effectiveness of treatment was evaluated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Ingredient costs from the provider’s perspective were collected in 2016 South African Rand and converted to $US, including bedaquiline at $US675.23 per 6-month treatment course. Culture conversion rates were derived from the phase IIb trial of bedaquiline, and disability adjustments were adapted from published literature. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3%.

RESULTS: For non-bedaquiline regimens, the total expected cost over the 10-year time horizon for a patient with MDR/RR-TB was $US4439 with disability-adjusted survival of 5.1 years. Replacing capreomycin with bedaquiline in patients who failed MDR/RR-TB treatment and required treatment for extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) resulted in cost savings ($US4356; 1.8% less) and similar effectiveness (0.02 DALYs averted). As a result, the standard regimen (no bedaquiline) was dominated. Replacing kanamycin with bedaquiline to provide all patients with MDR/RR-TB access to bedaquiline cost $US4647 (4.3% more) and averted 0.17 DALYs compared with the no bedaquiline regimen. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $US1242/DALY averted.

CONCLUSION: Markov modelling indicates providing bedaquiline for all patients with MDR/RR-TB could increase the 24-month treatment success rate in South Africa from 56.3% using the current regimen to 60.6%, at a cost $US2.6 million over a 10-year horizon, less than 1% of the estimated $US425 million SA NTP annual budget.

Read abstract here. 

 

3. The Expanding Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Targets.

ACS Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 15. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00255. [Epub ahead of print]

Wellington S(1)(2)(3), Hung DT(1)(2)(3).

ABSTRACT: After decades of relative inactivity, a large increase in efforts to discover

antitubercular therapeutics has brought insights into the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and promising new drugs such as bedaquiline, which inhibits ATP synthase, and the nitroimidazoles delamanid and pretomanid, which inhibit both mycolic acid synthesis and energy production. Despite these advances, the drug discovery pipeline remains underpopulated. The field desperately needs compounds with novel mechanisms of action capable of inhibiting multi- and extensively drug -resistant Mtb (M/XDR-TB) and, potentially, non-replicating Mtb with the hope of shortening the duration of required therapy. New knowledge about Mtb, along with new methods and technologies, has driven exploration into novel target areas, such as energy production and central metabolism, that diverge from the classical targets in macromolecular synthesis. Here, we review new small molecule drug candidates that act on these novel targets to highlight the methods and perspectives advancing the field. These new targets bring with them the aspiration of shortening treatment duration as well as a pipeline of effective regimens against XDR-TB, positioning Mtb drug discovery to become a model for anti-infective discovery.

Read abstract here. 

 

4. Early safety and efficacy of the combination of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Armenia, India, and South Africa: a retrospective cohort study.

Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 13. pii: S1473-3099(18)30100-2. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30100-2. [Epub ahead of print]

Ferlazzo G(1), Mohr E(2), Laxmeshwar C(3), Hewison C(4), Hughes J(2), Jonckheere S(3), Khachatryan N(5), De Avezedo V(6), Egazaryan L(7), Shroufi A(2), Kalon S(3), Cox H(8), Furin J(9), Isaakidis P(10).

BACKGROUND: Bedaquiline and delamanid have been approved for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in the past 5 years. Because of theoretical safety concerns, patients have been unable to access the two drugs in combination. Médecins Sans Frontières has supported the use of combination bedaquiline and delamanid for people with few treatment options since 2016. We describe early safety and efficacy of regimens containing the bedaquiline and delamanid combination in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Yerevan, Armenia; Mumbai, India; and Khayelitsha, South Africa.

METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of all patients who received 6-12 months of oral bedaquiline and delamanid in combination (400 mg bedaquiline once per day for 2 weeks, then 200 mg bedaquiline three times per week and 100 mg delamanid twice per day) in MSF-supported projects. We report serious adverse events, QTc corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) interval data, and culture conversion data during the first 6 months of treatment.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2016, and Aug 31, 2016, 28 patients (median age 32·5 years [IQR 28·5-40·5], 17 men) were included in the analysis. 11 (39%) of 28 patients were HIV-positive. 24 patients (86%) had isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones; 14 patients (50%) had extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. No patient had an increase of more than 500 ms in their QTcF interval. Four patients (14%) had six instances of QTcF increase of more than 60 ms from baseline but none permanently discontinued the drugs. 16 serious adverse events were reported in seven patients. Of 23 individuals with positive baseline cultures, 17 (74%) converted to negative by month 6 of treatment.

INTERPRETATION: Use of the bedaquiline and delamanid combination appears to reveal no additive or synergistic QTcF-prolonging effects. Access to bedaquiline and delamanid in combination should be expanded for people with few treatment options while awaiting the results of formal clinical trials.

FUNDING: Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF).

Read abstract here. 

JANUARY 2018 NEWSLETTER

1. Genome-wide analysis of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Nat Genet. 2018 Jan 22. doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0029-0. [Epub ahead of print]

Coll F(1), Phelan J(1), Hill-Cawthorne GA(2)(3), Nair MB(2), Mallard K(1), Ali S(2), Abdallah AM(2), Alghamdi S(4), Alsomali M(2), Ahmed AO(5), Portelli S(1)(6), Oppong Y(1), Alves A(7), Bessa TB(8), Campino S(1), Caws M(9)(10), Chatterjee A(11), Crampin AC(12)(13), Dheda K(14), Furnham N(1), Glynn JR(12)(13), Grandjean L(15), Minh Ha D(10), Hasan R(16), Hasan Z(16), Hibberd ML(1), Joloba M(17), Jones-López EC(18), Matsumoto T(19), Miranda A(7), Moore DJ(1)(15), Mocillo N(20), Panaiotov S(21), Parkhill J(22), Penha C(23), Perdigão J(24), Portugal I(24), Rchiad Z(2), Robledo J(25), Sheen P(14), Shesha NT(26), Sirgel FA(27), Sola C(28), Oliveira Sousa E(8)(29), Streicher EM(27), Helden PV(27), Viveiros M(30), Warren RM(27), McNerney R(31)(32), Pain A(33)(34), Clark TG(35)(36).

ABSTRACT: To characterize the genetic determinants of resistance to antituberculosis drugs, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 6,465 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from more than 30 countries. A GWAS approach within a mixed-regression framework was followed by a phylogenetics-based test for independent mutations. In addition to mutations in established and recently described resistance-associated genes, novel mutations were discovered for resistance to cycloserine, ethionamide and para-aminosalicylic acid. The capacity to detect mutations associated with resistance to ethionamide, pyrazinamide, capreomycin, cycloserine and para-aminosalicylic acid was enhanced by inclusion of insertions and deletions. Odds ratios for mutations within candidate genes were found to reflect levels of resistance. New epistatic relationships between candidate drug-resistance-associated genes were identified. Findings also suggest the involvement of efflux pumps (drrA and Rv2688c) in the emergence of resistance. This study will inform the design of new diagnostic tests and expedite the investigation of resistance and compensatory epistatic mechanisms.

Read abstract here. 

 

2. Defining Bedaquiline Susceptibility, Resistance, Cross-Resistance and Associated Genetic Determinants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

EBioMedicine. 2018 Jan 9. pii: S2352-3964(18)30005-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.005. [Epub ahead of print]

Ismail NA(1), Omar SV(2), Joseph L(2), Govender N(2), Blows L(2), Ismail F(3), Koornhof H(2), Dreyer AW(2), Kaniga K(4), Ndjeka N(5).

BACKGROUND: Bedaquiline (BDQ) is a novel agent approved for use in combination treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We sought to determine BDQ epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs), define and assess interpretive criteria against putative resistance associated variants (RAVs), microbiological outcomes and cross resistance with clofazimine (CFZ).

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to BDQ were determined using 7H9 broth microdilution (BMD) and MGIT960. RAVs were genetically characterised using whole genome sequencing. BDQ ECVs were determined using ECOFFinder and compared with 6-month culture conversion status and CFZ MICs.

FINDINGS: A total of 391 isolates were analysed. Susceptible and intermediate categories were determined to have MICs of ≤0.125μg/ml and 0.25μg/ml using BMD and ≤1μg/ml and 2μg/ml using MGIT960 respectively. Microbiological failures occurred among BDQ exposed patients with a non-susceptible BDQ MIC, an Rv0678 mutation and ≤2 active drug classes. The Rv0678 RAVs were not the dominant mechanism of CFZ resistance and cross resistance was limited to isolates with an Rv0678 mutation.

INTERPRETATION: Criteria for BDQ susceptibility are defined and will facilitate improved early detection of resistance. Cross- resistance between BDQ and CFZ is an emerging concern but in this study was primarily among those with an Rv0678 mutation.

Read free ScienceDirect article here. 

 

3. Catastrophic total costs in tuberculosis-affected households and their determinants since Indonesia’s implementation of universal health coverage.

Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Jan 12;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0382-3.

Fuady A(1)(2), Houweling TAJ(3), Mansyur M(4), Richardus JH(3).

BACKGROUND: As well as imposing an economic burden on affected households, the high costs related to tuberculosis (TB) can create access and adherence barriers. This highlights the particular urgency of achieving one of the End TB Strategy’s targets: that no TB-affected households have to face catastrophic costs by 2020. In Indonesia, as elsewhere, there is also an emerging need to provide social protection by implementing universal health coverage (UHC). We therefore assessed the incidence of catastrophic total costs due to TB, and their determinants since the implementation of UHC.

METHODS: We interviewed adult TB and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients in urban, suburban and rural areas of Indonesia who had been treated for at least one month or had finished treatment no more than one month earlier. Following the WHO recommendation, we assessed the incidence of catastrophic total costs due to TB. We also analyzed the sensitivity of incidence relative to several thresholds, and measured differences between poor and non-poor households in the incidence of catastrophic costs. Generalized linear mixed-model analysis was used to identify determinants of the catastrophic total costs.

RESULTS: We analyzed 282 TB and 64 MDR-TB patients. For TB-related services, the median (interquartile range) of total costs incurred by households was 133 USD (55-576); for MDR-TB-related services, it was 2804 USD (1008-4325). The incidence of catastrophic total costs in all TB-affected households was 36% (43% in poor households and 25% in non-poor households). For MDR-TB-affected households, the incidence was 83% (83% and 83%). In TB-affected households, the determinants of catastrophic total costs were poor households (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-7.8); being a breadwinner (aOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.3-6.6); job loss (aOR = 21.2; 95% CI: 8.3-53.9); and previous TB treatment (aOR = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.4-6.1). In MDR-TB-affected households, having an income-earning job before diagnosis was the only determinant of catastrophic total costs (aOR = 8.7; 95% CI: 1.8-41.7).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the implementation of UHC, TB-affected households still risk catastrophic total costs and further impoverishment. As well as ensuring access to healthcare, a cost-mitigation policy and additional financial protection should be provided to protect the poor and relieve income losses.

Read free PMC article here.

 

4. Meropenem-clavulanate for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a follow-up of relapse-free cases.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Jan 1;22(1):34-39. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0352.

Payen MC(1), Muylle I(2), Vandenberg O(3), Mathys V(4), Delforge M(1), Van den Wijngaert S(3), Clumeck N(1), De Wit S(1)

BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), defined as TB caused by a Mycobacterium strain resistant to at least rifampicin, isoniazid, any fluoroquinolone and one of the injectable anti-tuberculosis drugs, remains a worldwide public health threat. Among repurposed drugs empirically used for XDR-TB cases, carbapenems have been studied in vitro and in animal models, with encouraging results. However, only short-term follow-up data from clinical studies are currently available.

OBJECTIVES: To study the long-term follow-up of XDR-TB cases treated with a regimen containing meropenem-clavulanate (M/Clav).

DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series study at a single hospital.

METHODS: All hospitalised drug-resistant TB patients who received M/Clav as part of their treatment from 2009 to 2016 were included. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS: Eighteen XDR-TB patients were included in the analysis. The successful outcome and mortality rates were respectively 83.3% and 11.1%. No relapses were observed in cured patients after a median follow-up of 4 years. No specific adverse events were attributed to treatment with M/Clav.

CONCLUSION: The rate of sustained successful treatment outcome observed here is far higher than the 26% observed in the 2014 World Health Organization XDR-TB cohort, suggesting that carbapenems may be beneficial for the treatment of difficult-to-treat TB cases.

Read abstract here.